Skip to main content
Reviewed

The Telepathy Tapes, reviewed honestly

The communicators on the podcast are real. The paranormal frame is not the reason to take them seriously.

A note on terminology

You probably arrived here searching for facilitated communication, which is a term used under the broader umbrella of Assisted Communication (AC) — which also includes S2C, RPM, the Spellers Method, FC and Supported Typing. Each of these methods has distinct approaches, while they each share the foundational principles of presuming competence, authentic communication, and developing independence.

The Telepathy Tapes brought nonspeaking autistic typists to a mass audience for the first time in a generation. It also wrapped them in a paranormal frame that distracts from the actual scientific story. Both things are true at once, and treating them honestly means separating them.

What the podcast got right

  • Nonspeaking does not mean non-thinking. Many of the communicators featured are clearly literate, present, and articulate when given motor support.
  • Families' descriptions of breakthrough moments are recognizable to anyone working in this field.
  • The professional establishment's continued refusal to engage with contemporary evidence is itself a story worth telling.

Where the podcast went sideways

  • The telepathy frame is not the most parsimonious explanation for any of the moments shown — careful attention to partner knowledge, room acoustics, and fading stage matters here.
  • Conflating supported typing with paranormal claims gives critics an easy way to dismiss the entire field by association.
  • Communicators deserve to be taken seriously as communicators, not as evidence for psi.

What the real story is

Skilled supported typing — S2C, RPM, the Spellers Method, supported typing — is increasingly well-supported by peer-reviewed work on apraxia, eye-tracking (Jaswal et al., 2020), and independent typists who continue producing novel writing after all physical support has been faded. That story does not need telepathy to be remarkable. It is already remarkable.

Frequently asked questions

What are The Telepathy Tapes?
A 2024 podcast by Ky Dickens featuring nonspeaking autistic communicators who type with support, framed around claims of telepathy between typists and family members. The show drew large audiences and renewed public attention on supported typing.
Does this site endorse the telepathy claims?
No. We treat the supernatural framing as a distraction from the much more interesting and well-supported scientific story: skilled supported typing, eye-tracking evidence, neuromotor mechanisms, and the lived experience of nonspeaking communicators. The communicators are real; the paranormal frame is not the reason to take them seriously.
What should journalists actually cover?
The contemporary peer-reviewed evidence on apraxia in nonspeaking autism, Jaswal et al. (2020) eye-tracking results, the existence of independent typists, and the policy question of why several professional bodies still cite 1990s isolation-booth studies as if the field had not moved on.

Read further